Josette Ferrer Invited to Speak at IMA Controllership Forum
- 0 Comments
- Click here for details on the conference schedule and speakers
- Click here for a copy of Josette's presentation
On September 15, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment. Based on the guidance in the ASU, companies have the option to qualitatively determine whether they can bypass the two-step goodwill impairment test under FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 350-20,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Goodwill.
The new standard allows an entity first to assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform Step 1 of the two-step annual goodwill impairment test. An entity is required to perform Step 1 only if the entity concludes that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%). This is different than the previous guidance, which required entities to perform Step 1 of the test at least annually by calculating and comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount.
Qualitative Assessment Factors
Other Considerations
Effective Date
Resources
The FASB issued an Exposure Draft of a proposed ASU intended to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. The proposal would allow companies to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary.
The proposal would allow a company to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step goodwill impairment test. Current guidance requires an entity to test goodwill for impairment, on at least an annual basis, by first comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the second step of the test must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.
In the proposed ASU, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The ASU lists a number of factors to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment, including deteriorating macroeconomic, industry, or market conditions; entity-specific considerations such as a change in management or a decline in overall financial performance; and other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold.
If approved, the amendments in the proposed ASU would be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption would be permitted.
Under the guidance in the new Accounting Standards Update, an entity must consider whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists for a reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount. If it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. To make this determination, an entity should consider whether there are adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill. These factors could include (but are not limited to) an adverse business climate, unexpected competition, and loss of key personnel.
As a result of the new guidance, an entity can no longer assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test solely because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative.